Human capability before more natural resources
Natural resources are what they are. Without developing human capability in the right direction, new resources of lasting value are hard to create, and migration and debt become the remaining paths.
Natural resources are finite in a simple sense: what a region has in land, water, and minerals is largely given. Human capability is different. Without developing people, new sources of durable value do not appear. Expectations of living standards rise; local means of income do not always rise with them. In that gap, the remaining paths for many families become debt, selling land, and migration. That pattern is not unique to one hill district; it is common across rural regions.
If human development goes in the wrong direction, migration pressure only increases. The answer is not a speech about staying. It is paths of skill and work that make capability local enough to matter, so that leaving is a choice rather than the only rational move.
From X
Derived from posts on X as devendrasm: